Prosecutors Urge Judge to Uphold Trump’s Hush-Money Conviction
In a recent court filing, prosecutors are urging a judge to uphold Donald Trump’s historic hush-money conviction, despite the Supreme Court’s ruling on presidential immunity. The Manhattan District Attorney’s Office argues that the high court’s opinion is irrelevant to the case, as it involves unofficial conduct and the former president is not immune.
Legal Battles and Immunity Claims
Following the Supreme Court’s ruling, Trump’s lawyers are seeking to overturn the verdict and the indictment, citing evidence of illegal actions by the former president. They claim that the trial was rushed and tainted by evidence that should not have been allowed. However, prosecutors maintain that there is overwhelming evidence of Trump’s guilt.
Challenges and Sentencing Delays
The hush-money case, which involves falsifying business records to conceal payments to porn actor Stormy Daniels, resulted in a guilty verdict for Trump. His sentencing has been delayed pending a ruling on his immunity claim. The Supreme Court’s decision left the definition of official conduct to lower courts, creating further challenges in the legal proceedings.
In conclusion, the legal battle surrounding Trump’s hush-money conviction continues to unfold, with prosecutors standing firm in their arguments and Trump’s lawyers pushing for a reversal. The outcome of this case will have significant implications for the former president and the broader legal landscape.
